Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Jacob Jenkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J. Jacob Jenkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines (WP:ACADEMIC) DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity paradox. The article creator removed the AfD notices from both articles and has been warned not to do that again. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. Assistant professors (especially at teaching universities rather than research universities) have rarely made enough impact yet to pass WP:PROF#C1 and this one seems to be no exception. The awards are all too minor to be of interest. No other sign of notability evident. Article creator has only worked on very closely related articles, possibly indicating a conflict of interest. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. No sign of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable yet per WP:ACADEMIC and WP:PROF. gidonb (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.