Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isai Alvarado
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Isai Alvarado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Professional video game player, with some tournament success, but I have no idea what the standards for notability are here. Meanwhile, no sources either. I leave it to AfD to evaluate, but delete unless sourced. Xoloz 20:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is an unsourced article on some video game nerd with a long list of nothing to end with. This is about as encyclopedic as the last time I played Playstation--Looper5920 12:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I don't think he's notable. The article isn't written brilliantly, lots of tournament results presented in seemingly random blocks. If he won an official national or international tournament maybe that would affirm notability? Mallanox 22:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — unsourced, insufficient notability (WP:BIO). — ERcheck (talk) 01:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article requires massive improvement, but he is a key player in Major League Gaming. The article does need more sourcing, but it is well established that Isai Alvarado is the doubles partner of Ken Hoang. Both are well known within the Smash community (Hoang as the best player, the two as the Doubles champions). This link was previously cited on Ken Hoang's page, but seems to have gone bad Ken and Isai Win Smash Doubles. Rodomontade 01:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. . Mukadderat 17:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.