Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel L'Envers
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:20, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Isabel L'Envers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional topic with no real-world significance. The suggested merge article is itself up for deletion D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kushiel's Legacy. Same reason as all the other AfDs. Someone's bound to search for it, which means it meets WP:R#KEEP Criteria 5.--hkr (talk) 14:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect... article lacks real-world significance because there is no way to WP:verify notability. If there are no third-party sources for a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.