Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iram Shabbir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iram Shabbir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable politician. Fails WP:NPOL. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 14:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Chickadee46 talk 01:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Chickadee46 talk 01:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not terribly familiar with the political structure of India, but our article about Block Pramukh plainly indicates that it's a local government office roughly equivalent to what the countries I am more familiar with would call a municipal or county council. That is not an automatic inclusion freebie under WP:NPOL, and the volume of sourcing shown here is nowhere near approaching the level it would take to get her over WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 15:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Non-notable politician.Does not conform to WP:POLOUTCOMES.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 14:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Block pramukhs and other local elected officials are not inherently notable. I failed to find coverage in reliable sources. Subjects fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Pratyush (talk) 19:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.