Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invergence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invergence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional Rathfelder (talk) 22:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Invergence, as an alternative to divergence, is a term that has been used in the context of biblical genealogy.[1] But the interactive context in which the term has been used here seems to be a neologism with no uptake. There is a conference on the concept,[2] but it is not independent of the creator. Without independent reliable sources, the topic fails notability per WP:GNG. --Mark viking (talk) 23:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - internet marketing neologism that's basically an aspect of technological convergence (but not something that needs to be mentioned there, hence no redirect). The only sources cited here don't talk about the subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.