Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invented here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No action taken‎. Requests to redirect or merge articles are outside the scope of AfD because they are editorial actions that all can undertake on their own. However, what discussion there is would seem to support such an action. Sandstein 09:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invented here

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independent notability, should be folded into Not invented here. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:19, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close If you think this should be rolled into another article, then that calls for a merge discussion, not a deletion discussion. See Wikipedia:Merging#Proposing a merge. Largoplazo (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. It's the wrong place, but since we're in this blind alley, think of the children. Bearian (talk) 23:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Nothing to merge, and the term is barely attested. The only content that is sourced is two different ways of calling it, so there's not much point in putting the rest on Not invented here. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.