Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intranet DASHBOARD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Intranet DASHBOARD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertisement for a company which fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Zero hits on Google News, nothing independent or reliable on Google. 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 17:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 0x0077BE [^talk/_contrib] 17:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No references for a company advertisement. Nowhere close to WP:GNG, either. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 17:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found one review, now added as a reference to the article, but not enough to demonstrate notability, either as a company or a product. AllyD (talk) 18:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP: PROMO DCB1927 (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.