Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstellar Marines
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Interstellar Marines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
November 2005 crystal ball article for a game that's still unreleased and does not even have a publisher Beeblbrox (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, WP:CRYSTAL. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for it's Über Futureness. Undeath (talk) 00:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:CRYSTAL. ArcAngel (talk) 01:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This is why all "future" events are deletion candidates. When we let them go, we just end up with gibberish or wasted server space. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pixelface (talk) 08:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the article cites GameSpot, a reliable source. Wikipedia has all kinds of articles for future games. The game is in production and screenshots have been released. --Pixelface (talk) 08:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Crystal, indeed. nb: that unreliable gamespot post is 2+ years old. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gamespot is a reliable source and sources don't have an expiration date. --Pixelface (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 1) not. 2) an old product announcement not followed-up with substance is a pretty good indication of vaporware. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- GameSpot is a reliable source for gaming news and Wikipedia has many articles on upcoming video games. If you can cite a reliable source that says this game is "vaporware", go ahead (Wikipedia has several articles on "vaporware"). --Pixelface (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 1) not. 2) an old product announcement not followed-up with substance is a pretty good indication of vaporware. Cheers, Jack Merridew 06:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gamespot is a reliable source and sources don't have an expiration date. --Pixelface (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:CRYSTAL as above, and a single review from inclusionist site isn't significant coverage. Percy Snoodle (talk) 13:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I see no evidence that the game is still in production, indeed Zero Point Software does not appear to exist at all anymore and these trailers are the only thing they ever seem to have produced. Beeblbrox (talk) 09:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Eusebeus (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.