Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interreligious organisation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mgm|(talk) 09:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Interreligious organisation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:LINKFARM and not much else, really. Guy (Help!) 19:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to list I suggest removing all of the red links and converting this into a list, so it is no longer a wikilink farm posing as an article. The Seeker 4 Talk 20:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Most of them are weblinks, not wikilinks. And the ones which are wikilinks are usually not to articles on the organisations, just on the community in which they exist or some other related topic. Almost all of these are organisations which have, and should have, no article. Guy (Help!) 22:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but remove anything that only has an external link. This could be made into a list with a short description of each organisation. —Snigbrook 22:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment shouldn't the title be interfaith organization? Or ecumenical organisation? 76.66.193.90 (talk) 08:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep maybe as list. The great majority of the wikilinks are to specific articles on the organizations, just did a bit of wikification of some unlinked ones, and many of the weblinked ones should have their own articles.John Z (talk) 18:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as list and but only for organisations with wikipedia articles..--Sloane (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did it myself. --Sloane (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.