Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 22:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Internet philosophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research. StaticGull Talk 10:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nominator, its unencyclopedic more so than anything. A personal reflection of the subject. All in all, doesn't belong Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 12:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, essay, original research, also appears to be an attempt to advertise something called ICT, though doesn't do quite well as i don't know what that is. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above; purely WP:OR through and through. Only redeeming quality is that it makes me want to re-write my CV in a similar style: "he was not someone of fame or power or glamour , … , not yet!" OBM | blah blah blah 14:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Woah, like, deep thoughts, dude. Delete as unsalvagable (and nearly incoherent) essay. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definitely OR Mrh30 (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SNOWBALL Delete as per nom. --triwbe (talk) 18:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I will vote keep for this article when the author publishes his philosophy from a reputed and academic publisher. We can certainly use his book as a reference for this article. But for that purpose the author should go to a publisher, not wikipedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not an encyclopedia article. JuJube (talk) 23:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR WikiScrubber (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR. Article isn't about anything; instead, it promotes a point of view on man's relation to the internet. RJC Talk Contribs 15:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should have been speedy'd.--Buridan (talk) 15:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a personal essay. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 13:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.