Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Central

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 05:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Central

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated by IP. Nomination rationale appears to be "This article does not meet the general notability guideline and reads as advertising." (AfD page created by User:richhallstoke, not nominator) Trying to rectify the situation. I am neutral at this time, but may !vote later. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had previously edited the Internet Central page with the intention of improving the encyclopaedic nature of the article, trying to remove marketing language and draw attention to points of notability, and since it was marked it for deletion I've edited it once more to the same end. Perhaps rather than deleting it we could rescue it by further improvement in the areas of verification and notability? So many pages seem to get deleted before people have chance to address issues. --richhallstoke (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2011 (GMT+1)

~~Speedy keep without prejudice as a malformed nomination lacking a nomination rationale. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)~~ Striking, as I was able to find what appears to be the nomination rationale. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 17:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Qrsdogg (talk) 22:36, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: little in the way of "significant coverage", though this may be due to the generic nature of the title masking relevant coverage. Certainly the sources cited do little to demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 14:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is about a local ISP. No showing of significant effects on technology, culture, or history. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.