Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Box Podcast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Box Podcast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this podcast aside from a sole mention in some awards whose notability is questionable itself. PROD contested by adding a bunch of self-published sources. Some Wikipedians might be dissuaded from deletion because of this, but not me, I'm afraid. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks notability and is referenced almost entirely by personal blogs. - Mr X 16:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:GNG for the lack of reliable independent sources since a good faith search yielded no such result. We should note that while WP:WEBCRIT states "The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization.", and this podcast did win such an award, it also states "Wikipedia should not have a separate article on any web content that does not meet the criteria of either this guideline (WP:WEBCRIT) or the general notability guideline (WP:GNG), or any web content that, despite meeting the rules of thumb described above, for whom editors ultimately cannot locate independent sources that provide in-depth information about the web content. Wikipedia's goal is neither tiny articles with no realistic hope of expansion nor articles based primarily on what the subject or its creators say about themselves.". Thus, sadly it also fails to meet WP:WEB. Nimuaq (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough coverage in reliable sources. It appears to have won an award, but there appears to be little coverage about it winning that award. At this point, It's unlikely to ever expand. Unless someone else finds any reliable coverage, then I can't see how this is notable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.