Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intercloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intercloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was described as "mostly vendor hyperbole" in a comment in 2010, and I agree with that assessment. The vendor hyperbole appears to have died out without a notable product existing. Most of the references are press releases, and while there are at least two companies of this name, I see nothing about this as a concept. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete from the first sentence I thought this is real academically explored concept, but with contradiction in the subsequent paragraph, lack of reliable sources from my search and convincing nom statement, I bilieve this should be deleted before it is qouted in academic work and the work is quoted back to Wikipedia starting vicious cycle of WP:CIRCULAR –Ammarpad (talk) 02:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.