Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterNiche Technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 19:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- InterNiche Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Joe Chill (talk) 03:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 04:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: ...develops and markets source code licenses for TCP/IP and related modules designed to satisfy the communication and device management needs of embedded devices. Their relentless striving for vagueness leaves you guessing whether their product actually consists of source code or legal template texts. Obvious advertising, and not really a sufficient claim of importance, either. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are a number of notable suppliers of IP protocol stack software. This is not one of them. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 17:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of sources on Google and Yahoo that could support an article about a company. SwisterTwister talk 01:42, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.