Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterNations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

InterNations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination requested by 82.81.125.200 (talk · contribs) [1]. Rationale is "I saw this article and it does not appear to be notable--just fluff to promote a start-up website". I am neutral — frankie (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not seem to be notable: none of the source provided seem reliable (mostly blogs, etc). There also seem to be big problems with POV and is written like an advert. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, yes, without reliable sources, advertisement, and doesn't meet WP:WEB. Alex^{discussion ★} 21:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I came to the article looking for information about this website, because I was curious after some people discussed participated in many InterNation events. I wouldn't want it to be deleted. It has alexa rank 10,760, so it is a high-traffic website. I agree there is much potential for improving the article, but I think it's much better and easier to improve existing articles, than to start over and over again all the time. Fuelbottle (talk) 12:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fuelbottle, I appreciate your concern but, if we are to keep the article, we need to establish notability. Can you provide any sources which demonstrate the subject of the article to be notable? ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 15:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.