Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellikey Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 19:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intellikey Labs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any sources that would indicate that this company meets the notability guidelines set out at WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Could have been a speedy as there's rally no assertion of notability in the article. Otherwise, a simple "not found in reliable sources" case. Tarc (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:CORP LibStar (talk) 09:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.