Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectus language centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Skomorokh, barbarian 17:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intellectus language centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Appears to be a non-notable organization; I cannot find independent reliable sources to show notability. Chzz ► 12:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely no evidence of notability whatsoever. A company established two months ago. Zero Gnews hit. Only Ghit of English name is WP. Lithuanian name has 7 Ghits in total, and no reliable source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Copied from my nom, which was made at about the same time... Tim Song (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Contested PROD per request. No notability, COI problems with the creator.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 12:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CORP by a mile. --Cameron Scott (talk) 13:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious speedy delete - no need to bother with AfD. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I prodded the article to allow it some times to extend, but the lack of sources made that kind of hopeless right from the start. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 16:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7, so nominated. ukexpat (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.