Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. -R. fiend 05:30, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Advert Secretlondon 21:33, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- D as ad for NN trade rag. Fawcett5 14:34, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not enough participation here. Relisting to encourage more. -Splashtalk 00:43, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless notability is established. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:36, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly is verifiable. Needs to be NPOV'd but that's not reason for deletion. Grace Note 03:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Trade magazines have sufficient readership to claim notability because of it. Perhaps a slight rewording is needed. - Mgm|(talk) 08:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ad. utcursch | talk 11:19, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite per Grace Note.
- er that's my unsigned above...--Isotope23 18:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but improve. Qaz (talk) 04:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Poorly written, but needs editing, not deleting. Sure, it's just a trade rag, but so are PC World (magazine) and InfoWorld. --RoySmith 23:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.