Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InstantCab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

InstantCab

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, advertising, orphan. Notnoteworthy (talk) 06:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Local company which has not received significant coverage even locally.[1] Fails WP:CORP by a mile. --MelanieN (talk) 17:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, subject of this AfD appears to have received significant coverage from The Tech Crunch, which is published by AOL, and The Next Web, both of which I am unsure whether they are reliable sources. If they are, I am inclined to think that the subject of this AfD meets WP:GNG, however, if they are not, then they would clearly not meet GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.