Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Transportation Proposals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Innovative Transportation Proposals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Originally included self-published original research (which I have removed). Now it reads a little advert-ish. Doesn't seem like there is much here to be saved that isn't already in the main articles already referenced. JCutter (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The first section (LeviCar/RoboTrail) is unsourced, and looks like pure speculation without much to back it up. The second part is just a shortened combination of the Transatlantic tunnel and Vactrain articles, and I cannot see any need for that. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:07, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have been adding brief comments about many other speculative systems, and intend to e-mail the progenitors of these systems so that they may update and augment these. This way, the referenced article can become a living source for those interested in innovative and speculative transportation systems. Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 04:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup per the improvements made in the article. It still has a ways to go, but it looks like it's suitable for inclusion, now. MuZemike 19:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Still just a here invented collection of unimplemented ideas. If kept then by all means remove the word "innovative" from the title. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.