Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initiative of Communist and Workers' Parties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is a consensus that the current sourcing is enough to pass notability. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Initiative of Communist and Workers' Parties

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same problems as World Anti-Imperialist Platform. 0 independent and reliable sources. All sources in this article are either bulletins of communist parties, phishing websites or organization's own website. I tried to search online about this organization but was not able to find any reliable sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nom is correct; sources are not reliable (except I think the "phishing websites" are just janky websites with expired certificates); no SIGCOV anywhere. Not notable. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 08:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Once again, The topic is inherently notable and the sources are appropriate. It's interesting seeing the exact same two users advocating for the same point in the last four deletion discussions, on the discussions for Initiative of Communist and Workers' Parties, World Anti-Imperialist Platform, European Communist Action, International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties. Castroonthemoon (talk) 14:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is it inherently notable? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A European political alliance of notable parties, which took part in the 2014 European Parliament election and 2019 European Parliament elections.--ElTres (talk) 21:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly notable international organization. Fresh blackcurrant (talk) 01:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, notable organisation per sources in the article. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 07:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable European political alliance, even if defunct. Julius Schwarz (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.