Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inhabitants of Imaginationland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inhabitants of Imaginationland

Delete Hardly worthy of its own article. I sugggest merging Imaginationland, Imaginationland Episode II, and episode 3 (once it airs) and just putting the list into that article.--Swellman 18:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Imaginationland Will ^(talk) 19:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; it shouldn't even be in an article, let alone its own article. Dlong 21:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all Imaginationland articles into one. Concerning this list, we should find more sources for various characters, and remove all the characters that remain unsourced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96T (talk • contribs) 22:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agreed with 96T. That's exactly what I was thinking, just have one article for the three episodes, and merge the lists. I'm not for deleting the list all together, seeing as alot of the names are sourced and their has been quite a bit of coverage surrounding the matter.--Swellman 22:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Dlong. Completely non-notable. Doctorfluffy 06:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Let's address the AfD only here. If you were to discuss about merging the articles, discuss that on their talk pages. The lists do not belong on the articles or as a separate list. Douglasr007 06:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I would suggest a merge into the list of one-off characters, but it appears that that list has since been deleted - as such, there's no reason for this list to exist. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 10:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theres no reason to have mostly the same list in three articles and I don't want to see the episodes merged. I would settle to move this list to a page with minor SP characters as has been suggested.--Cartman005 21:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Why have one big list when three little lists serve a better purpose? How else are you meant to know which episode each character came from? JayKeaton 05:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because mostly the same characters are in each episode. And have you even looked at the page? There is a key for which episode they came from.--Cartman005 00:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any characters that were in episode one AND episode two don't need to be repeated in episode two. The episode two page can just have "new character" list. I do think the lists are important, but not important enough for its own page JayKeaton 04:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Dlong. Completely non-notable. †Poison the Well† 20:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability and debatable concept. [[Guest9999 21:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)]][reply]
Keep. A well designed and cited list, and an excellent way to trim the lists off the articles for the individual episodes, which should remain separate of themselves. Notable appearances of notable characters in a show with an enormous audience who will certainly seek out this information. Captain Infinity 22:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not worthy of its own article. 68.220.166.89 23:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not even merge. I don't see how this information is useful at all. Mahanga^Talk 03:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, serves no imaginable encyclopedic purpose. --Akhilleus (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, serves no imaginable encyclopedic purpose and no evidence of notability. 65.0.169.127 14:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.