Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informatist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. lifebaka++ 19:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Informatist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article does not seem to meet the general notability guideline, and the article has been tagged as such since last year. Article is also very much written like an advertisement. I also could not find any verifiable sources establishing said notability. MuZemike (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 09:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment (From the article) "Informatist has been recommended for students as an educational business simulation[1] and is used in several schools as a part of Business Studies and Economics.[citation needed]" if the second part of this sentence can be proven, it sounds notable to me. -Verdatum (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, if a verifiable, third-party source can be found to back this up, then I say notability will have been established, and I'll consequently withdraw the AfD nomination. MuZemike (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no coverage of this game in reliable sources. With respect to its use as a teaching aid, I see no evidence of it. The link provided is a teacherweb entry which looks like a laundry list of resources that teachers might want to use. -- Whpq (talk) 13:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.