Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Info.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing notability. Zero references and an internet search yielded only the sites home page info.co.uk. Blue Riband► 13:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Survived previous AfD after two references from notable magazines were provided. You can see in an older version of the article that these used to be featured in the article but were removed for some reason somewhere down the line.LM2000 (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'd recommend wp:trouting the editor who removed the references in the last AfD - but they were an IP. Either way they were notable last time and wp:NTEMP Neonchameleon (talk) 18:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Had the nominator read the previous AfD discussion, he/she could have restored those two references him/herself. Unscintillating (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.