Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infant Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was was speedy deleted as G11 by User:Jimfbleak (non-admin closure). SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infant Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strong Advertising. --AM (Talk to me!) 00:14, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as pure spam. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok--AM (Talk to me!) 00:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per CSD G11. Obvious advertising. --TL22 (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Yeah, it's spam and there's no media coverage whatsoever. gargleafg (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Obvious spam is obvious. –Davey2010^Talk 04:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.