Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indulekha.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). Gr1st (talk) 09:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indulekha.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non notable site according to me. The site has a claim to fame though... To hold an online exhibition of books?? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- One of the links is flagged by FF 3 as an attack site. all the other refs talk about the said "first to hold an online exhibition" press release ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It seems to meet the second criterion at WP:WEB. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - it reads a little too much like self-promotion. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep It meets WP:WEB and it only needs a little work of which I have started. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 12:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.
Added an article about the website from The Hindu newspaper,which combined with the Limca Book of Records coverage, should be enough to pass the general notability guidelines. Gr1st (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, article was already linked to, but now an inline cite. Gr1st (talk) 12:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Avinesh Jose T 04:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, please see the record "First online show of all books of a writer"??? If we accept this as notable. then, I'm willing to withdraw my nomination. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We shouldn't use our personal standards to determine acceptability. If the Limca Book of Records has recognized it, I would believe they earn a mention. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- A noteworthy achievement that is mentioned in the Limca Book of Records. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn I withdraw the nominations ChiragPatnaik (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.