Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndiaMART

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IndiaMART

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sounds very much like an advertisement with phrases like "With tremendous achievements made in past many years, IndiaMART has even bigger expansions planned for its user-base. It intends to become the search engine for businesses." all over the article, speedied 4 times before, current version was G11d by Deb before being restored for AfD after a discussion on IRC. WP:SPAM. Thanks, and cheers, Lixxx235-Talk 16:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 03:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rewrite to remove all promotional phrasing. Articles like this one, already used as a reference, establish quite clearly that this is a highly notable website in India. Of course, we should have an article about IndiaMART. Normal editing is the solution to the article's problems, not deletion. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The India Times refs (2) are good, but nothing else seems reliable. The sources are currently borderline, can anyone provide examples of more reliable sources? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are two The Economic Times refs and one The Times of India ref. Red Herring top 100 is also good. And here are some more: Business Line [1], The Indian Express [2], one more The Economic Times [3]. It's also in the Bharat Bhasker's book "Electronic Commerce" published by Tata McGraw-Hill. So I would say that it has the necessary significant coverage. --Cosmopolite1 (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rewrite. Delete information without good references. --Cosmopolite1 (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Violating and promotional contents can removed. CutestPenguin (Talk) 15:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keepand rewrite to avoid WP:COI. Harrison2014 (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.