Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImLive.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ImLive.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, broken links, just another website. Alexa rank, 18,099, not covered by mainstream media, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NWEB. Also, creater of this article User:Download has been already banned for paid editing. Störm (talk) 09:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable website. --Wyatt2049 | (talk) 12:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No reliable source. Barca (talk) 22:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of any notability, Can't find anything on Google, Fails CORDEPTH & NWEB. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 22:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rationale given above. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.