Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideafixa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ideafixa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable magazine. Xyz or die (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Provisional delete (The guidelines relating to this are WP:WEB#Criteria) There are a good number of Google hits for this South American, Spanish-language webzine but many appear to be blog-like in nature.
If anyone (perhaps with a grasp of Spanish) can demonstrate any secondary sources to be reliable, I will naturally support a Keep. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 22:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is a related book at Worldcat, but the magazine is not listed. If libraries don't take note of the magazine, we probably shouldn't either. Unscintillating (talk) 18:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.