Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iayaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted A7 and A11.. (non-admin closure) Java Hurricane 12:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iayaz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fail to see how this possibly meets inclusion criteria of a town that is not even "constructed" yet. Praxidicae (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, per above. ~ HAL 333 19:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly speedily. Article title is the name of the author--the subject is Wapda Town Sheikhupura. Author has already created Draft:Wapda Town Sheikhupura, had it rejected at AfC, then apparently moved it to mainspace anyway where it was G11-speedied. This history of the current version is full of WP:CIR-noncompliant activity--author created in user sandbox, then moved it to mainspace as Iayaz/sandbox. Prax moved it back, after which author immediately moved it to its current title. After the article was tagged for AfD, author tried to move it to its talk page. Author has apparently ignored the advice received from four trips to the AfC Help Desk. (1, 2, 3, 4) Pass the WP:SALT? --Finngall ^talk 21:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.