Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Had Cancer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 22:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Had Cancer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: insufficiently notable entity which has been copied and pasted to read like a promotional format. Quis separabit? 21:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- (change from delete) sources offered below are convincing, but "reads like a press release" is right. The article needs to be improved. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:WEBCRIT, and it's not wholly promotional enough to merit WP:TNT. Don't know where anyone else was looking, but it was pretty easy to find full articles in Forbes, Washington Post, TechCrunch, Cnet, TheNextWeb, The Sun, ReadWrite, Zdnet... these from the first few pages of ghits. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes, those are some very good independent sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.