Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISOWORG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ISOWORG

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional term. c y m r u . l a s s ^{(talk me, stalk me)} 07:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redirect or merge Could be redirected to Henry Bentinck, 11th Earl of Portland, but as the novel in question isn't even mentioned there, a merge might be better. I can see no need for a keep, so failing this proposal, get shut of it. Peridon (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable fictional term. Delete per NOT:Avoid neologisms. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable doesn't need a stand alone article (not enough information for a stand alone article). Merge as appropriate. --Quartermaster (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of sources to WP:verify notability of this fictional term. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.