Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPv17

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IPv17

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced article about a new networking protocol. I am unable to find any reliable sources about the subject. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 00:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is much too soon for an article. It's not a new internet protocol version supported by an international body; it's a new commercial product in the fundraising stage. See here. There seem to be no sources independent of the company as yet. StarryGrandma (talk) 02:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advertising cruft. No notability. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom and above. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing out there other than promotional stuff. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No notability yet, any speculation that it will be implemented ever is just that and violates WP:CRYSTAL. Smartyllama (talk) 17:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.