Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I54

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I54

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional? Notability? Possible original research? I cannot see any notability for the article. DragonofBatley (talk) 12:59, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG: [1] [2] [3] [4] Cremastra (u — c) 22:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notability is established by the sources already included in the article. This nomination appears to be somewhat WP:POINTy, and to be a response to discussion at Talk:Central_Park_(Telford)#Notability, where the notability of an article created by the nominator, about another business park, is under discussion. PamD 08:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.