Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-exceed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I-exceed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed to find any other news source for this company. Variation 25.2 (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Highbeam returns a couple of routine product announcements, Google returns the usual social media and company listings. The most substantial that I am seeing is a blog entry that the firm made a presentation at FinovateAsia in 2013. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. (I see a speedy G11 was declined but this could meet A7 as it makes no claim to notability?) AllyD (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per AllyD and the lack of any good sources in the article. CorporateM (Talk) 01:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only reference reads like a news release, and it probably is. I couldn't get any good information about the CIOL news site either: It may not have an independent news staff. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches instantly found nothing and especially see this list of self-generated coverage. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The article was considerably modified on Aug 19. Please address the new version.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Link bombed with passing mentions and press releases. Still not up to WP:CORP--Savonneux (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I closed this after a half hour of checking, but in the meantime Ymblanter had relisted, so I've reverted my close in favor of the relist. —SpacemanSpiff 08:27, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and above editors. Nothing to show notability in any of the searches. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.