Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Good
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all. Carlossuarez46 21:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article can never go beyond a tracklisting and a infobox. Mixtapes rarely, if ever, receive reviews or sales and many of them are not even official. It is a non-notable and trivial article. ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 11:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all fall under the same reasons as above:
- Mick Boogie - Kanye Essentials: First Semester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Get Well Soon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Akademiks: Jeanius Level Musik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Akademiks: Jeanius Level Musik 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Kon the Louis Vitton Don (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- The High School Graduate Mixtape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- If mixtapes rarely if ever receive reviews, why is the #1 google hit a review of this mixtape? Kappa 12:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, maybe this one is one of the "Rare" ones. My point is though these are all non-notable articles, what can you add to the article from that review? its all an opinion of somebody, there is no news or any significant coverage of these tapes. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 12:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't use any of 'The best of these new tracks is the unrelentingly rousing modern-day hip-hop epic, "2 Words", which features guest appearances from Mos Def, Freeway, and the Harlem Boys' Choir. Over the rolling thump of a thunderous drum kit, harpsichord lines tumble into butter-smooth electric guitar licks, while frenetic soulful wails provide the perfect canvas for Mos', Kanye's, and Freeway's relentless rhymes. However, this is all before Kanye breaks the song down for a stirring a cappela section from the Harlem Boys' Choir, which gives way to a frenzied stutter-step hip-hop hoe-down featuring a turbulent violin solo to close (that's right, I did say violin solo!)....The most amazing aspect of the track, though, is that it marks Kanye's characteristic mastery of balancing an "underground" hip-hop aesthetic, with elements from the mainstream"'? Kappa 21:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well. No you can't really. It mostly opinion. But dont you all get the nomination, its because there non-notable. Loads of mixtapes have been deleted recently. People are cracking down on them unless they are notable. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 21:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So you are nominating them in accordance with WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST? Why didn't you just say that, I wouldn't have wasted my time refuting the nomination. Kappa 21:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well. No you can't really. It mostly opinion. But dont you all get the nomination, its because there non-notable. Loads of mixtapes have been deleted recently. People are cracking down on them unless they are notable. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 21:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't use any of 'The best of these new tracks is the unrelentingly rousing modern-day hip-hop epic, "2 Words", which features guest appearances from Mos Def, Freeway, and the Harlem Boys' Choir. Over the rolling thump of a thunderous drum kit, harpsichord lines tumble into butter-smooth electric guitar licks, while frenetic soulful wails provide the perfect canvas for Mos', Kanye's, and Freeway's relentless rhymes. However, this is all before Kanye breaks the song down for a stirring a cappela section from the Harlem Boys' Choir, which gives way to a frenzied stutter-step hip-hop hoe-down featuring a turbulent violin solo to close (that's right, I did say violin solo!)....The most amazing aspect of the track, though, is that it marks Kanye's characteristic mastery of balancing an "underground" hip-hop aesthetic, with elements from the mainstream"'? Kappa 21:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, maybe this one is one of the "Rare" ones. My point is though these are all non-notable articles, what can you add to the article from that review? its all an opinion of somebody, there is no news or any significant coverage of these tapes. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 12:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - None of the above mixtapes appear to be official, probably compiled by random DJs whom aren't associated with West himself. If it was official, for example You Know What It Is Vol. 3, then they could be kept, but West most likely had nothing to do with these mixtapes. --- Realest4Life 15:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Your example, You Know What It Is Vol. 3, is only able to be kept because it is semi-notable with information about sales with reviews etc. These, even if they were official do not have any of those and are not notable enough to ever have them. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 16:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Even if these are official, it fails WP:N. I did a Google search of each of the mixtapes on Kanye West discography#Mixtapes and only 1 or 2 have reviews. This is definitely not what WP:N calls "significant coverage" that addresses "the subject directly in detail". With a typical album, you have background info, production, sales, chart performance, reception from a wide range of music critics etc. But these mixtapes can never have this kind of info. Spellcast 12:55, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per lack of reliable third-party sources. Cool Hand Luke 15:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.