Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Alive and on Fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 13:00, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Alive and on Fire

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poorly sourced album. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has an Allmusic rating/review. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography". --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~:** I agree with Jax 0677. Ashley yoursmile! 08:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Keep. The Allmusic review is not trivial, and there are more reviews out there like [1], [2]. Geschichte (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NALBUMS. Reviews in multiple publications demonstrates significant coverage and clearly indicates that the album is notable for a standalone article. --Ashley yoursmile! 14:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - Per WP:NALBUM, "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography".

Plenty of reviews to use to expand the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Be Bold! --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.