Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HyperTunnel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 04:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- HyperTunnel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Product with no evidence of notability. The article has no references. Searching for HyperTunnel AND HyperTransport (to focus on this product instead of different products with the same name) on Google Web returns 155 results. A large number are Wikipedia mirrors and the rest are not reliable sources that can evidence notability. Using the same query, Google News and Books returns no results, while Scholar returns one thesis with what appears to be a passing mention. Rilak (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this seemed to start its life in 2005 as an article about a different topic, and then became this one in 2006. Not even anything to rescue with a merge. W Nowicki (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.