Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrosynth (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs) per G4: "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion". Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrosynth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism, absent on Google E Wing (talk) 05:51, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I couldn't find anything this topic. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Where shall we begin... The article is complete WP:OR that can't be verified and as such fails notability guidelines Pmedema (talk) 08:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom, Narutolovehinata5, and Pmedema. Furthermore it appears to be a blatant case of COI.--Kudpung (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and feed to the ansestorial gods; article was already deleted once after a deletion discussion; so tagged. This version does nothing to address the issues that led to its deletion before, and contains much of the same text: Sometimes this music is call bling bling because it sounds shiny sparkly like a diamond BLIG BLING lucky charm champagne. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.