Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunting by scent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hunting by scent

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A rather pointless, incuratable list which would include almost all predatory mammals, about 2/3 of predatory fish, most snakes, and about a million invertebrate species. There might be some mileage in a general treatment of olfactory-driven predation, but that needs a completely different setup and material. In the meantime, this isn't it. Suggest deletion, as I'm unaware of any good redirect targets - please feel free to suggest some. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Biology. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article as it is is just a mess. A workable article on the subject would be so different that we might as well delete, and then let someone recreate, probably with a slightly different title.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think the subject itself is worth inclusion, but as it stands, I definitely agree with the OP; this is definitely not a necessary article. I would potentially suggest merging the content with Predation#Specialization, but as it stands, I'm not really sure how. Sleddog116 (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.