Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humo (programming language)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Humo (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I did a cursory search in Google for this; I was unable to turn up anything that indicates why this esoteric programming language is notable. (Most of what I found has something to do with HuMo-gen, something to do with genealogy, and things related to humor in some fashion.) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:36, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article was created by User:Fpetrola with ref to programmer Fernando Petrola who created Humo. Almost nothing comes up on Google, apparently only sources connected directly with Petrola, so no evidence of notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:GNG —Ruud 19:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.