Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hudson Selection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hudson Selection

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NVIDEOGAMES. Unsourced. » Shadowowl | talk 23:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The added references mean very little, one is a blog, and the other a review of one of the games. I couldn't find anything about the series as a whole. It's also certainly not suitible for mainspace. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:55, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with Lee Vilenski. It exists, but there's very little information on it. On the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, it's just mentioned in passing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 09:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. A review of an enhanced remake of a game that is a component of Hudson Selection confers notability on Hudson Selection as a whole. A blog can be a reliable source if it is subject to the same quality control and editing as a print publication. Sometimes a blog is one person's unedited ramblings, but sometimes it is as good as a print publication. In this case, GameBlog seems to be the equivalent of a print publication. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I do not think that "A review of an enhanced remake of a game that is a component of Hudson Selection confers notability on Hudson Selection as a whole" Rather, it's an additional reference for the article on the game. We do not usually contsideranthologies notale because they contain notable items, or every anthology would be notable. DGG ( talk ) 16:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 16:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC) "[reply]
Delete The games can each be discussed in the respective articles of the games they are remakes of. The remake series is not notable. TarkusAB^talk 14:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. ZettaComposer (talk) 12:30, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and DGG. --1l2l3k (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.