Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Cut & Paste: 80's Edition
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- How to Cut & Paste: 80's Edition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- DELETE This is a non notable mixtape. Excuse me, "mix cd". JBsupreme (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A K-Tel collection disguised as a "new album". Not incredibly notable in any sense, and few links outside of mirrors, purchase links, and very basic discographies which just say 'this album exists'. Nate • (chatter) 08:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - definitifly not notable in any sense. At all per above. The sources say only that this exists. Barras || talk 10:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable recording. --Tckma (talk) 17:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Two reviews from reliable sources mean that this is notable and should be kept.--Michig (talk) 23:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Depends on who you ask. Joe Chill (talk) 23:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No it doesn't, it depends on our notability guidelines.--Michig (talk) 23:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't multiple so yes, it does. There are people that are fine with two sources and other people that are fine with multiple. You stated should like a fact. Joe Chill (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you serious? Multiple means 'more than one' - we even have a dictionary where you can look these things up.--Michig (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm serious. Two is a couple and three or more is multiple which is what many users go by. So "it depends on who you ask". Joe Chill (talk)
- And Michig, look up couple in the dictionary. Joe Chill (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Linguistic discussion taken to dictionary corner.--Michig (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you serious? Multiple means 'more than one' - we even have a dictionary where you can look these things up.--Michig (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't multiple so yes, it does. There are people that are fine with two sources and other people that are fine with multiple. You stated should like a fact. Joe Chill (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No it doesn't, it depends on our notability guidelines.--Michig (talk) 23:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Depends on who you ask. Joe Chill (talk) 23:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, passes notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums for the sources, as in plural, as in more than one, as in multiple. Esradekan (talk) 12:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Just being reviewed doesn't make it notable. Lack of charting, however, does make a strong case for being non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.