Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HotBox Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HotBox Radio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find no coverage of this internet radio station in Independent reliable sources. Ridernyc (talk) 07:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The radio station has enough coverages from reliable sources. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nick, that comment is utter bullshit, I'm stumbling across these Ridernyc-nominated afds of your articles as someone who is an inclusionist at heart, and you are doing a disservice by making claims you can't support!--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milowent, please comment on the content, not the contributor, and don't take any other editor's personal opinion as best practice. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again please provide us with coverage in multiple reliable sources because I can find none. Ridernyc (talk) 08:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note Article creator has admited to what appears to be paid promotional editing here. [1] Ridernyc (talk) 09:38, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note - Please, check paid editing and I never admitted that and never intended to create articles that do not meet the wikipedia policy for my own profit. The nominator didn't show any guidance and also received comments from other editors for nominating articles for deletion without researching in depth. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources that establish notability?

Note If you think the links given in reference section are not reliable then explain the reason on the debate. Please, share your views for proposing the deletion. Please, don't just comment that you didn't find any reliable sources etc. If the sources are found non-reliable or no reliable sources are added then admins will do the rightful for the article. Also, you'll not find me arguing with non-reliable sources. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can find no newspaper or book sources for this internet-only radio station.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 (shock, horror): An article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. No evidence that this station has been allocated any AM or FM transmission with a significant audience that might allow it to pass WP:BROADCAST. We're left with a one line stub saying "HotBox Radio is a non-notable piece of internet radio run by a non-notable person". Zero news and book hits. Unsalvageable, I'm afraid. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will note that in this case I thin the article creator actually made this article wore after nomination. At first it at least mentioned one of his other non-notable articles which gave the illusion of a claim to notability. Ridernyc (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unless the article is edited to show that it is being broadcast legally, not merely webcast. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. Where are the independent sources? Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.