Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High altitude wind power patents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

High altitude wind power patents

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a strange page. If anything, it should be at List of high altitude wind power patents, but that would make it an awfully specific list of individually non-notable entries. Very, very few patents merit articles here, and a list of likely non-notable patents in a very narrow field does not seem particularly notable either. bd2412 T 18:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTLINK.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lists of patents are useless at explaining the development of any invention unless there is some narrative and analysis as well as a bald listing of possibly non-notable individual patents. If the reader can figure anything out from a list of patents, he doesn't need an encyclopedia article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wtshymanski. Totally unencyclopedic. GabrielF (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.