Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HexD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Modussiccandi (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HexD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable genre that hasn't received any traction or significant coverage outside of bandcamp blogs and a few passing mentions elsewhere. CUPIDICAE💕 15:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing that may be useful to explore while looking for good sources for this hexd subgenre is that it is known by at least two other names, namely surge and sigilkore. Sigilkore has it's own dedicated descriptive sources mentioning bitcrushing and all that stuff.
The issue is the authoring. If the author of this article is unwilling to work more on it, it's probably going to get deleted as a lazy attempt. I have no interest in hexd right now to improve it as well. The issue I am concerned with is I suspect topic has significant coverage yet poor presentation. And I am unsure whether it would be allowed to re-create this article with more sources later when it gets deleted now? So, weak keepPDDisPDDat (talk) 03:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the special about "soundcloud demonic underworld" outlining the current wave of soundcloud rappers, also touching those in "hyperpop" and "hexd" categories:
Comment Sources on sigilkore:
Weird thing is that all these teens right now are are basically making hexxed glitched hyper-electronic trap about how hard they are but every one of them calls it their own name. Like, you would probably find no difference between hexd and sigil sound-wise and aesthetics-wise, but these labels are used by different soundcloud-to-bandcamp producers claiming that their thing is unlike anything else. It doesn't help that journalists desribing the said "genres" are falling for it and categorizing them as separate entities (tongue-in-cheek, even though even they acknowledge that all these "genres" are basically the same genre, referring to the No Bells Soundcloud special)
For instance, googling for "sigilkore hexd" bring up the situation I described. The same type of music goes by million names, among them hexd, sigilkore, surge, hexmusic, crushed, glitchcore and what else. It's natural that the journalists usually pick one or else this would be daunting to list all these names upon every mention PDDisPDDat (talk) 13:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Soundcloud rap is a better destination, in my opinion. Trap is still very much a street black genre and suddenly including hexd as a subsection is going to frankensteinize the trap article. EDM trap is a very distant (both in time and in scenes overlap) phenomenon in regards to hexd. PDDisPDDat (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Hyperpop would be an even better destination for the merging. But those familiar with hyperpop should probably voice their opinion as I am not an expert in either of the two. PDDisPDDat (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to come to consensus on a merger destination
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not linked to any other article and surely you would be some artiste's bios having some mention of it. It would be sub-sub-sub-genre that is invisible in the naked light. Perhaps if its still going in a couple of years and there more links it could be recreated. scope_creepTalk 13:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Seems reasonable to merge it to Mumble rap#SoundCloud rap scene if not deleted and assuming a couple or three can be found. If somebody went to length of creating the article there must be quite a big group associated with it. scope_creepTalk 14:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.