Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heterosexualization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfy (non-admin closure), creator of article has agreed[1] to move this page to his userspace, where he will work on sourcing and re-writing. The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Heterosexualization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an essay, not an encyclopedia article. There may be something here about which a decent article could be written, but I think it would be very difficult to make an article out of this essay. Aleta Sing 16:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Aleta Sing 16:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Aleta, is it against the rules to simply move this article into Masculinity's userspace, where he could rewrite it and add references out of harm's way?--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That seems entirely reasonable to me, Fat Man, if Masculinity will agree to that course of action. I'd be glad to move it myself if it's agreed to go that route. Aleta Sing 16:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- i don't have a prob. i guess its better than being deleted altogether.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Masculinity (talk • contribs)
- That seems entirely reasonable to me, Fat Man, if Masculinity will agree to that course of action. I'd be glad to move it myself if it's agreed to go that route. Aleta Sing 16:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Aleta, is it against the rules to simply move this article into Masculinity's userspace, where he could rewrite it and add references out of harm's way?--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing all sorts of official Wikipedia policies: unreferenced, fails WP:VER; non-neutral, fails WP:POV; original essay, fails WP:OR; opinion piece, fails WP:SOAP. And so on and so on... andy (talk) 16:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for gross failure of NPOV and insubstantial sourcing. — James Cantor (talk) (formerly, MarionTheLibrarian)
- Delete—POV-ish essay failing several core policies such as WP:V and WP:NOR, and WP:SOAP. —Mizu onna sango15Hello! 17:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.