Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemu Aggarwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hemu Aggarwal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly-sourced biography of a non-notable author. Fails WP:AUTHOR - Mr X 11:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 23:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with the reasoning. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable spiritual counselor. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not properly asserted. She has written one book that is purported to be a best-seller, but I can find no evidence to support that claim. Jsharpminor (talk) 01:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any evidence of significant coverage. Article can be recreated later with reliable sources – if they exist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Inadequately sourced. RomanSpa (talk) 05:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Have been unable to find notable coverage as above appears to fail WP:NOTE due to this Amortias (T)(C) 14:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.