Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthcare workflow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare workflow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept might be even notable, but the wiki article is definitely WP:TNT-worthy being essentially an (unsourced) advert for a blog. If someone wants to "save" this by rewriting it, be WP:BOLD. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems this page was created as part of the promotion package for HealthFlow and RetroGuide. The author of this wiki page wrote the primary sources cited in those other wiki pages, and also wrote at least one of those articles (a more mysterious SPA wrote the other). Someone not using his real name (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.