Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Bisaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Bisaria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person fails WP:NPOL and references are mere mentions of the person and lacks WP:GNG ~ Amkgp 💬 15:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. vice chairperson of social media for the student wing of a political party, with no significant coverage in RS. Captain Calm (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable for the purposes of guaranteeing inclusion in Wikipedia, but the sourcing is not solid enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass any SNGs. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks significant coverage in RS. - Tatupiplu'^talk 20:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Person is notable links are enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blabragram (talk • contribs) 02:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: afd (talk • contribs) Blabragram is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]
delete the national vice chairman for social media is not a notable position.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete falls well short of WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above, WP:GNG, WP:NPOL. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. -Hatchens (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.